Search result: One clinical trial was found and traced concerning resin-modified GIC (RM-GIC). The material was Fuji II LC (compared to: Tetric Flow and Helioseal F). No trials were identified comparing conventional GIC (C-GIC) with composite resin.
Clinical outcomes: The overall results suggest a higher antibacterial effect for RM-GIC up to 6 months.
[‘Preliminary Systematic Literature Searches’ are based on SYSTEM’s periodic systematic searches of the dental literature and provide first overviews over existing clinical evidence but are limited in the number of databases searched, as well as the assessment of precision and internal validity of results and thus do not replace the need for a full systematic review report to the topic]
Mickenautsch, S. (2019). Antibacterial effect of GIC versus composite resin [October 04, 2016]. Afribary. Retrieved from https://track.afribary.com/works/antibacterial-effect-of-gic-versus-composite-resin-october-04-2016
Mickenautsch, Steffen "Antibacterial effect of GIC versus composite resin [October 04, 2016]" Afribary. Afribary, 27 May. 2019, https://track.afribary.com/works/antibacterial-effect-of-gic-versus-composite-resin-october-04-2016. Accessed 25 Dec. 2024.
Mickenautsch, Steffen . "Antibacterial effect of GIC versus composite resin [October 04, 2016]". Afribary, Afribary, 27 May. 2019. Web. 25 Dec. 2024. < https://track.afribary.com/works/antibacterial-effect-of-gic-versus-composite-resin-october-04-2016 >.
Mickenautsch, Steffen . "Antibacterial effect of GIC versus composite resin [October 04, 2016]" Afribary (2019). Accessed December 25, 2024. https://track.afribary.com/works/antibacterial-effect-of-gic-versus-composite-resin-october-04-2016