Search result: One clinical trial was found and traced concerning resin-modified GIC (RM-GIC).
Clinical outcomes: The material was Fuji II LC (compared to: Tetric Flow and Helioseal F). No trials were identified comparing conventional GIC (C-GIC) with composite resin.
[‘Preliminary Systematic Literature Searches’ are based on SYSTEM’s periodic systematic searches of the dental literature and provide first overviews over existing clinical evidence but are limited in the number of databases searched, as well as the assessment of precision and internal validity of results and thus do not replace the need for a full systematic review report to the topic]
Mickenautsch, S. (2019). Antibacterial effect of GIC versus composite resin [October 08, 2018]. Afribary. Retrieved from https://track.afribary.com/works/antibacterial-effect-of-gic-versus-composite-resin-october-08-2018
Mickenautsch, Steffen "Antibacterial effect of GIC versus composite resin [October 08, 2018]" Afribary. Afribary, 29 May. 2019, https://track.afribary.com/works/antibacterial-effect-of-gic-versus-composite-resin-october-08-2018. Accessed 27 Nov. 2024.
Mickenautsch, Steffen . "Antibacterial effect of GIC versus composite resin [October 08, 2018]". Afribary, Afribary, 29 May. 2019. Web. 27 Nov. 2024. < https://track.afribary.com/works/antibacterial-effect-of-gic-versus-composite-resin-october-08-2018 >.
Mickenautsch, Steffen . "Antibacterial effect of GIC versus composite resin [October 08, 2018]" Afribary (2019). Accessed November 27, 2024. https://track.afribary.com/works/antibacterial-effect-of-gic-versus-composite-resin-october-08-2018