Search result: 7 trials were found.
Clinical outcomes: The results suggest that various composites (nanohybrid, flowable) show good results. Etch-and-rinse adhesives appear to be superior to all-in-one adhesives, while compomers and resin-modified glass-ionomers appear to be less effective than composites.
[‘Preliminary Systematic Literature Searches’ are based on SYSTEM’s periodic systematic searches of the dental literature and provide first overviews over existing clinical evidence but are limited in the number of databases searched, as well as the assessment of precision and internal validity of results and thus do not replace the need for a full systematic review report to the topic]
Mickenautsch, S. (2019). Clinical merits of restorative treatment of root (cervical) caries lesions [November 13, 2017]. Afribary. Retrieved from https://track.afribary.com/works/clinical-merits-of-restorative-treatment-of-root-cervical-caries-lesions-november-13-2017
Mickenautsch, Steffen "Clinical merits of restorative treatment of root (cervical) caries lesions [November 13, 2017]" Afribary. Afribary, 29 May. 2019, https://track.afribary.com/works/clinical-merits-of-restorative-treatment-of-root-cervical-caries-lesions-november-13-2017. Accessed 20 Nov. 2024.
Mickenautsch, Steffen . "Clinical merits of restorative treatment of root (cervical) caries lesions [November 13, 2017]". Afribary, Afribary, 29 May. 2019. Web. 20 Nov. 2024. < https://track.afribary.com/works/clinical-merits-of-restorative-treatment-of-root-cervical-caries-lesions-november-13-2017 >.
Mickenautsch, Steffen . "Clinical merits of restorative treatment of root (cervical) caries lesions [November 13, 2017]" Afribary (2019). Accessed November 20, 2024. https://track.afribary.com/works/clinical-merits-of-restorative-treatment-of-root-cervical-caries-lesions-november-13-2017