Electoral Processes And Democratic Elections In Sudan

ABSTRACT

The study examined the influence of electoral processes and democratic elections in the Republic of Sudan. This research was prompted by the fact that despite the provision in the National Elections Act of 2008 to ensure free and fair elections, what actually happens during election periods is different from guidelines; intimidation and violence in some areas of Sudan undercut inclusiveness; the NEC is seen insufficiently transparent and lacked full independence from the central government, which undermine trust; the legal framework for elections failing to provide effective means for contestants seeking redress; and most importantly electoral process seemingly lacking sufficient safeguards and transparency.

The study applied questionnaire and interview guides for the research survey; data was collected from 211 respondents using questionnaires and few questionnaire guides. Simple random sampling and purposive sampling were used. Simple charts, regression analysis and Pearson’s Correlation coefficient was done to analyze results of findings. Findings revealed that there was strong positive correlation between all the independent variables: electoral mass sensitization, electoral legal framework and electoral supervision; and the dependent variable: democratic elections in the Republic of Sudan. There existed a positive and statistically significant (.000) relationship between electoral processes and democratic elections, as portrayed by the strong positive relationships between the variables.

The study concluded that in all, electoral processes in the Republic of Sudan translate into much needed free and fair elections although ignorance of the legal framework is much prevalent among the electorates.