LOCAL GOVERNMENT ADMINISTRATION AND THE SOCIAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF THE CITIZENS. A CASE STUDY OF TORORO LOCAL GOVERNMENT IN EASTERN UGANDA.

LIST OF TABLES

Table 4.1: Showing the Gender of the Respondents 23

Table 4.2: Showing the Marital Status of the Respondents 23

Table 4.3: Showing the age of the respondents 24

Table 4.4: Showing Qualification of Respondents 24

Table 4.5: showing time the respondents have worked with the local government 26

Table 4.6: showing responses to whether local government administration targets are set and

known to the council 27

Table 4.7 showing responses to whether there is budget performance monitoring at the district. 28

Table 4.8 Showing responses to whether local government administration resolutions are

communicated to all concerned officials 29

Table 4.9: Showing whether the budgeted revenues are always achieved 30

Table 4.10: Showing responses to whether budgets are communicated in understandable terms

31

Table 4.11: Showing responses to whether there is better local government administration

performance at the council 32

Table 4.12: Showing responses to whether the leaders are well informed about local

government administration 33

Table 4.13: Showing responses to whether budget objectives are interpreted and communicated

34

Table 4.14: Showing responses to whether Local government administration are used for

performance measurement 35

Table 4.15: Showing responses to whether Local government administration performance

measurement is an ongoing process 36

Table 4.16: Showing responses to whether performance indicators are based on social

development 37

Table 4.17: Showing responses to whether public services are accessible to all 38

Table 4.18: Showing responses to whether there is prioritizing of public services 39

Table 4.19: Showing responses to whether the quality of services is portrayed in the amounts

allocated to the services 40

Table 4.20: Correlation 41