INTRODUCTION:
This report presents a quantitative desk analysis on secondary data sieved from materials such as Deep Dive Report, STS Baseline Studies, Unicef Report 2013 and Product Prototype Report of Water Easy Toilet (WET) to establish the potential sales and suppliers’ revalidation in Enugu, Ekiti and Jigawa State. This report presents detailed actual situational analysis of the existing suppliers and other prospective sanitation businesses in Ekiti and Enugu States. The report further established the analysis of potential supply chain of businesses in sanitation products in Enugu, Ekiti, and Jigawa states and as well provide a sales projection that will be used for local investors.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title page --------------------i
Acronyms ------------------ii
List of tables/Charts-- --- --- -- --- -- -- -- iii
List of Picture Plates ---. --- --- --- --- --- --- -- iv
1.0 Section I:
1.1 introduction----------------1
1.2 Problem Statement ------------ ------4
1.3 Research Questions ------------ ------5
1.4 Objectives of the study --------------5
1.5 Justification of the study --------------5
⦁Organization of the study ------------6
2.0 Section 2: Research Methodology
2.1 Logit Model -------------- ----9
2.1.1 Logit Transformation --------------10
Section 3: Date Analysis
3.1 Evaluation of Existing Suppliers, Location and prospective Sanitation Businesses -------------------------------10
3.2 Existing Suppliers, Location and Sanitation Businesses in Enugu State --------------------15
3.2 Existing Suppliers and Prospective Sanitation Businesses in
Ekiti ------------ ---- --------15
3.3 Existing Supplier and Prospective Sanitation Businesses in
Enugu and Ekiti State --------------23
4.0 Section 4: Overview of Sanitation Coverage
4.1 Sanitation Coverage in Enugu, Ekiti and Jigawa States --27
4.2 Distributions of Households and Types of Toilet Facility in Enugu, Ekiti and Jigawa States ------------ 32
5.0 Section 5: Willingness to pay for and use improved Toilet
6.0 Section 6: The Supply Chain
6.1 Marketing & Sales ----------------37
6.2 The Complete latriae --------------38
6.3 Sales Projection in Enugu, Ekiti & Jigawa States ----38
7.0 Section 7.
Conclusion and Recommendations
APPENDIX
Acronyms
WET – Water Easy Toilet
LGAs – Local Government Areas
WANG – Water Aid Nigeria
UNICEF – United Nation International Children’s Emergency Fund
MDG–Millennium Development Goal
NGOs – Non-Governmental Organizations
USAID – United State Aid.
CLTS – Community Led Total Sanitation.
OD– Open Defecation.
VIP – Ventilated Improved Pit
WHO – World Health Organization
WTP– Willingness to pay.
WC – Water Closet.
List of tables
Table 2.1: Selected Local Government and Communities 6
Table 3.1: Summary of Selected Local Governments and Communities --------------------10
Table 3.2: Disaggregated Suppliers Location and Sanitation Businesses --------------------11
Table 3:3 Prospective Sanitation Businesses in the Study Areas, Enugu State --------------------12
Table 3.4: Disaggregated Suppliers and Sanitation Businesses by L.G.A. ----------------------14
Table 3.5: Local Governments, Settlements and Villages Covered: (Attach defails in Appendix) --------------15
Table 3.6: Disaggregated Suppliers Location and Sanitation Businesses in Ekiti (Attach defails in Appendix). ------16
Table 3.7: Prospective Sanitation Businesses in the Study Area, Ekiti State. --------------------21
Table 3.8: Disaggregated Suppliers and Sanitation Businesses by L.G.A. ----------------------22
Table 3.9: Existing Supplier of Sanitation Businesses in Enugu and Ekiti States. ------------------24
Table 3.10: Prospective Sanitation Businesses in Enugu and Ekiti States Study Areas. ----------------25
Table 4.1: Households Sanitation Coverage (%) for Improved Toilets. ----------------------28
Table 4.2: Households Sanitation Coverage (%) for Unimproved Toilets. ----------------------30
Table 4.3: Percentage Distribution of Households and Types of Toilets Facility. ------------------32
Table 4.4: Approximate Cost of Improved Latrine by Type.34
Table 4.5: Sanitation Practices (with Latrine). ------35
Table 4.6: Amount willing to pay for Improved Households Toilet Facility. ----------------------39
4.6a: Daily Sales of Toilet Facilities in Enugu State. ----39
Table 4.6b: Daily Sales of Toilet Facilities in Ekiti State. ----41
Table 4.7: Annual Percentage Distributions of Households and Type of Toilet Facility. ----------------42
List of Figures/Charts
Figure 4: Map of the study Area in Enugu State. ----------------------2
Figure 5: Map of the study Area in Ekiti State. ----------------------2
Chart 1: Prospective Sanitation Businesses in Enugu State Study Areas. ----------------------13
Chart 2: Percentage Representation of San Mark Business in Enugu State. --------------------13
Chart 3: Disaggregated Supplies and Sanitation Businesses By L.G.A. ----------------------15
Chart 4: Prospective Sanitation Business in Ekiti Study Areas 21
Chart 5: Percentage Representation of San Mark Business in Ekiti State. --------------------22
Chart 6: Disaggregated Suppliers and Sanitation Businesses by L.G.A----------------------23
Chart 7: Graphical Representation of Existing Supplier and Prospective Sanitation Businesses in Enugu and Ekiti States25
Chart 8: Graphical Representation of Prospective Sanitation Businesses in Enugu and Ekiti States study Areas. ----26
Chart 4.2: Households Sanitation Coverage (%) for Unimproved Toilets. ----------------------30
Chart 4.3: Annual Distribution of Households and Type of Toilet Facility by State (%).----------------33
Figure 4.1: Stages of Sanitation ------------31
Figure 5.1: Supply Chain Map. ------------37
Subscribe to access this work and thousands more