ABSTRACT
The purpose of this study was to provide banks, economic planners and policy makers with
knowledge on individual’s saving behaviour so as to assist them in framing appeals accordingly.
To achieve this, the study sought to test the applicability of the life cycle hypothesis of saving to
Zimbabwe. The life cycle hypothesis of saving is one of the well-known theories thatseek to explain
individual’s saving behaviour. The study was motived by the lack of depositor confidence and
the challenge of accretive transitory deposits coupled by stagnant long term deposits which have
faced the country since the introduction of the Multiple Currency System (MCS) despite money
supply being on an upward trend. A coalesced of the comparative and survey research design,
where data was collected from a sample of 512 respondents drawn from the general public in
Bulawayo and Gweru was found to be the most appropriate. Quantitative and qualitative data was
collected using a combination of questionnaires, interviews and secondary data from the 2012
national census and Poverty Income Consumption and Expenditure Survey (PICES) 2011/12. This
data was analysed using a combination of MS Excel, Stata 12, thematic and content analysis. The
results of the study revealed that the major motive for saving during an individual’s working years is
for the purchase or construction of land and housing. Saving for life after retirement was the fourth
most common motive for saving coming after the saving for children’s education and the
precautionary motive. Furthermore, the results found that the primary source of income during
retirement was business, professional and farming profits. In line with the life cycle hypothesis,
income followed a ‘humped’ pattern peaking in middle age. However, income did not exceed
consumption in the middle age contrary to the life cycle hypothesis. Moreover, the study revealed
that age varies with asset holding in a ‘wave’ shaped pattern. Despite the actual results suggesting
that the life cycle hypothesis is not applicable, the study found that if one goes by people’s intentions
and attitudes the life cycle hypothesis was applicable in Zimbabwe. Given that the life cycle
hypothesis is not applicable in Zimbabwe, banks are therefore advised to frame appeals for the
purchase or construction of land and housing for cohorts in the 25-44 year age group. Banks can
frame appeals on retirement products to those approaching retirement as this motive only becomes
dominant as people approach retirement. Lastly, the study recommends banks to raise awareness of
‘pay yourself first’ in addition to educating people how to save for retirement.
MPOFU, N (2021). The Applicability Of The Life Cycle Hypothesis Theory Of Savings To Zimbabwe: Post Dollarisation. Afribary. Retrieved from https://track.afribary.com/works/the-applicability-of-the-life-cycle-hypothesis-theory-of-savings-to-zimbabwe-post-dollarisation
MPOFU, NJABULO "The Applicability Of The Life Cycle Hypothesis Theory Of Savings To Zimbabwe: Post Dollarisation" Afribary. Afribary, 09 May. 2021, https://track.afribary.com/works/the-applicability-of-the-life-cycle-hypothesis-theory-of-savings-to-zimbabwe-post-dollarisation. Accessed 27 Nov. 2024.
MPOFU, NJABULO . "The Applicability Of The Life Cycle Hypothesis Theory Of Savings To Zimbabwe: Post Dollarisation". Afribary, Afribary, 09 May. 2021. Web. 27 Nov. 2024. < https://track.afribary.com/works/the-applicability-of-the-life-cycle-hypothesis-theory-of-savings-to-zimbabwe-post-dollarisation >.
MPOFU, NJABULO . "The Applicability Of The Life Cycle Hypothesis Theory Of Savings To Zimbabwe: Post Dollarisation" Afribary (2021). Accessed November 27, 2024. https://track.afribary.com/works/the-applicability-of-the-life-cycle-hypothesis-theory-of-savings-to-zimbabwe-post-dollarisation