Search result: Two clinical trials were found.
Clinical outcomes: There appears to be no difference in the survival rate of both types of restorations after 2 years. [‘Preliminary Systematic Literature Searches’ are based on SYSTEM’s periodic systematic searches of the dental literature and provide first overviews over existing clinical evidence but are limited in the number of databases searched, as well as the assessment of precision and internal validity of results and thus do not replace the need for a full systematic review report to the topic]
Mickenautsch, S. (2019). Restoration longevity of conventional high - viscosity GIC restorations versus direct composite filings [October 25, 2017]. Afribary. Retrieved from https://track.afribary.com/works/restoration-longevity-of-conventional-high-viscosity-gic-restorations-versus-direct-composite-filings-october-25-2017
Mickenautsch, Steffen "Restoration longevity of conventional high - viscosity GIC restorations versus direct composite filings [October 25, 2017]" Afribary. Afribary, 28 May. 2019, https://track.afribary.com/works/restoration-longevity-of-conventional-high-viscosity-gic-restorations-versus-direct-composite-filings-october-25-2017. Accessed 25 Dec. 2024.
Mickenautsch, Steffen . "Restoration longevity of conventional high - viscosity GIC restorations versus direct composite filings [October 25, 2017]". Afribary, Afribary, 28 May. 2019. Web. 25 Dec. 2024. < https://track.afribary.com/works/restoration-longevity-of-conventional-high-viscosity-gic-restorations-versus-direct-composite-filings-october-25-2017 >.
Mickenautsch, Steffen . "Restoration longevity of conventional high - viscosity GIC restorations versus direct composite filings [October 25, 2017]" Afribary (2019). Accessed December 25, 2024. https://track.afribary.com/works/restoration-longevity-of-conventional-high-viscosity-gic-restorations-versus-direct-composite-filings-october-25-2017